Your search query "linkto:"LtgOslo/BibTeX"" didn't return any results. Please change some terms and refer to HelpOnSearching for more information.
(!) Consider performing a full-text search with your search terms.

Clear message


When writing jointly, with various sub-groups of people, one of the more time-consuming tasks can be the unification of BibTeX entries from multiple sources. To avoid duplicate entries in bibliographic references, it can be helpful to use a common scheme for generating citation keys, i.e. the unique strings used in \cite{} commands. Furthermore, there is some stylistic variation in how to typeset bibliographic references, and there can even be discrepancies between different so-called BibTeX styles, for example in the range of entry types that they support and which files they allow (or require). Thus, it can further be useful to converge on a small-ish subset of common BibTeX styles and make sure to operate within their parameters.

Towards a Shared References Collection

All LTG staff should be able to access an emerging collection of shared LaTeX and BibTeX files in SVN:

  svn co ltg

Inside the bib/ sub-directory, there is a hierarchy of folders to hold a (future) file-based database of BibTeX entries. The main reason to keep each entry in a file of its own is version control in SVN, where there will be a natural notion of (original) authorship and revision history for each individual entry. With the exception of files in the etc/ folder, each entry should be in a file of its own, named according to its unique citation key (see below) and, for ease of retrieval, stored in the sub-directory of the first letter of the citation key.

We envision various ways of taking into use this database, ranging from merely copying individual entries into a personal BibTeX file, concatenating all entries into a single file (for inclusion in a specific writing project), or using entries directly from the SVN database. Over time, we will have more to say an possible use cases.

The most common pattern of use so far appears to check out the LTG BibTeX database as a sub-directory called ltg with each writing project. Then, folks often use a Makefile as follows:

submission.pdf: submission.tex ltg.bib
        -/bin/rm submission.bbl
        pdflatex submission
        bibtex submission
        pdflatex submission
        pdflatex submission

        cat ./ltg/bib/etc/general.bib ./ltg/bib/etc/conferences.bib \
          ./ltg/bib/etc/journals.bib ./ltg/bib/etc/addresses.bib \
          ./ltg/bib/?/*.bib > ltg.bib

The above will concatenate the complete BibTeX database into a file ltg.bib, which can then be used in the actual paper (here, we are assuming that the master file is called submission.tex), e.g.


In the above, ltg.bib is (optionally) combined with an ad-hoc collection of BibTeX entries in a file called local.bib.

Naming Conventions for Citation Keys

Please consult the files below ltg/bib/ (in the above SVN repository) for existing entries and inspiration in creating new entries. Specifically, please obey the following format in creating citation keys:

We plan to continually grow our collection of BibTeX entries and share it within the group (and possibly external collaborators), therefore consistency of entries is important. Also, note that there is a set of pre-defined strings in the etc/ sub-directory, e.g. for the names of conferences and institutions. Where applicable, please make good use of these or add additional ones, for example:

  @string{MONS:04 = {Rapport fra det 10. møte om norsk språk}}
  @string{L:MONS:04 = {Kristiansand, Norway}}

    author = {Johannessen, Janne Bondi and Nygaard, Lars},
    title = {Oslo-skogen. {E}n trebank for norsk},
    booktitle = MONS:04,
    address = L:MONS:04,
    pages = {},
    year = 2004

Conventions for Individual BibTeX Fields

In crafting individual BibTeX entries, there are a number of choices regarding the values to individual fields to be made. Inevitably, different publishing channels will have different requirements. Following are some reflections and recommendations, to maximize portability and reuse across channels.

In terms of names, some channels encourage full given names while others abbreviate first names to just initials. In principle, this choice should be made by a specific BibTeX style, but for there to be a choice, the raw data needs to make available the necessary information. Hence, our recommendation is to write out given names in shared BibTeX entries, for example:

  author = {Toutanova, Kristina and Manning, Christoper D.
            and Flickinger, Dan and Oepen, Stephan}

In a few corner cases, it may be appropriate to resort to variant ways of structuring a list of authors, for example:

  author = {Rosén, Victoria and De~Smedt, Koenraad and Meurer, Paul},

We also recommend specifying names in the format ‘Flickinger, Dan’, i.e. letting the given name(s) follow the family name, separated by a comma. This way the part that is the family name is explicit, which means we encode more information (partly in anticipation of BibTeX someday handling Asian-style names).

In terms of capitalization of (book) titles, again there will be different demands for different channels, and control should largely be delegated to the BibTeX style. To support the wides possible range of use cases, use so-called title case (rather than standard capitalization rules for running text, so-called sentence case), e.g.

  title = {Paraphrasing Treebanks for Stochastic Realization Ranking}

When using BibTeX styles that automatically downcase, it is important to protect capital letters or acronyms that must never be spelled in lower case. For example:

  title = {Stochastic {HPSG} Parse Selection using the {R}edwoods Corpus}

In accordance with the BibTeX manual (and the APA recommendations; see below) the address field for conference and workshop proceedings should record the location of the conference (not the business address of the publisher). In fact (contrary to many entries in the ACL Anthology) @inproceedings entries need not include the publisher field for ‘pseudo-’publishers like the ACL, ELRA, EAMT, et al.

Recommended BibTeX Styles

Several LTG members use the APA citation style, which is very comprehensive, highly customizable, and relatively well documented. Where the ACL conferences, for example, in principle prescribe the use of their own BibTeX style, it is usually straightforward to substitute APAcite and deliver a very convincing mimicry of the ACL citation style, while avoiding its shortcomings.

Other Relevant Best Practices

As always, use Unix-style newlines and UTF-8 character encoding. Wrap all lines at column 80 (i.e. using a column-width value of 79 in a modern editor like emacs). Please finish each file with a closing newline.

As regards in-text bibliographic references, the APA citation package provides three basic macros: \cite{}, \citeA{}, and \citeNP{}. The first form yields a reference enclosed in parenthesis, suitable for citations that serve as background information, i.e. typically act like parentheticals to their context of use. The second form only parenthesizes the year of publication and is suitable for references that serve a grammatical function in their context of use. Finally, the third form lacks all parentheses and can be used to avoid double embedding, i.e. when used within an enclosing set of parentheses. Consider the following example to see the three distinct forms:

  \citeA{Lon:Oep:Ber:04} sketch the LOGON MT system, which has some superficial similarity
  to the earlier VerbMobil effort \cite{Wahlster:00} and employs semantic transfer in the
  framework of Minimal Recursion Semantics (\MRS; \citeNP{Cop:Fli:Pol:05}).

Once typeset and processed by BibTeX, this will yield:

(The DELPH-IN infrastructure is hosted at the University of Oslo)