Differences between revisions 2 and 3
Revision 2 as of 2011-06-28 15:35:31
Size: 1128
Editor: StephanOepen
Comment:
Revision 3 as of 2011-06-28 15:36:49
Size: 1161
Editor: StephanOepen
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
## page was renamed from MrsRFC

Request For Comments: MRS

Overview

Formal Properties

Required properties:

  • TOP
  • INDEX
  • RELS
  • HCONS

Note that there is debate about the status of INDEX. It is not part of the formal definition of a complete MRS (see Copestake et al., 2005), hence Ann has at times argued it should be suppressed when constructing an MRS from its TFS description. On that point of view, INDEX is an element of the composition process, but not the 'final' product.

Conversely, it has been argued (by Dan and Francis, among others) that composition does not stop at the utterance level, i.e. if we were to move into discourse-level analysis, we might still need access to INDEX. Furthermore, in semantic transfer it is often convenient to have access to the INDEX (even more so as the current ERG leaves the TOP underspecified). In conclusion, as of mid-2011, I believe INDEX can be considered a legitimate component of MRSs, even though it remains true that it has a slightly different formal status than the others

Syntaces

Simple MRS

Indexed MRS

MrsRfc (last edited 2018-11-05 06:23:59 by MichaelGoodman)

(The DELPH-IN infrastructure is hosted at the University of Oslo)