Differences between revisions 11 and 12
Revision 11 as of 2018-07-15 02:47:46
Size: 9398
Comment:
Revision 12 as of 2018-08-08 03:06:23
Size: 6947
Comment: Updated BNF for selected docstring pattern; removed obsolete discussion
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 27: Line 27:
TDL types allow a doc string: TDL definitions allow documentation strings ("docstrings") before any term in the top-level conjunction or before the terminating dot (`.`) character:
Line 29: Line 30:
n_-_c_le := n_intr_lex_entry &
"Intransitive count noun (icn)
n_-_c_le := n_intr_lex_entry
"""Intransitive count noun (icn)
Line 32: Line 33:
<nex>Much dog bark.". <nex>Much dog bark.""".
Line 40: Line 41:
TdlTypeFile := ( TypeDef | Spacing )* EOF TdlTypeFile := ( TypeDef | TypeAddendum | Spacing )* EOF
Line 45: Line 46:
TypeDef := Type ( AvmDef | AvmAddendum ) Dot
AvmDef := DefOp DefBody
AvmAddendum := AddOp ( DefBody
                      | DocString? Conjunction
                      | DocString )
LexRuleDef := LexRuleId DefOp Affix? DefBody Dot
DefBody := Supertypes ( And DocString? Conjunction | DocString? )
Supertypes := Type ( And Type )*
TypeDef := Type DefOp TypedDefBody Dot
Typeddendum := Type AddOp ( DefBody | DocString ) Dot
LexRuleDef := LexRuleId DefOp Affix? TypedDefBody Dot
LexRuleId := Identifier Spacing

# Definition Bodies (top-level conjunctions of terms)
#
# The body of a type definition, type addendum, or lexical rule is
# essentially a conjunction of Terms, but there are two special features
# of top-level conjunctions (i.e., those outside of an AVM):
#
# (1) """DocStrings""" may precede any Term or the final Dot (.)
#
# (2) TypeDef and LexRuleDef require at least one Type (supertype)
# somewhere in the conjunction (conventionally the first Term)

TypedDefBody := ( TopLevelConj And )? DocString? Type ( And TopLevelConj )? DocString?
DefBody := TopLevelConj DocString?
TopLevelConj := DocString? Term ( And DocString? Term )*
DocString := TQString

# Terms and Conjunctions

Conjunction := Term ( And Term )*
Line 54: Line 71:
LexRuleId := Identifier Spacing
DocString := DQString
Conjunction := Term ( And Term )*
Line 97: Line 111:
BlockComment := "#|" /([^|\\]|\\.|\|[^#])*/ "|#" BlockComment := "#|" /([^|\\]|\\.|\|(?!#))*/ "|#"
Line 115: Line 129:
TQString := /"""([^"\\]|\\.|"(?!")|""(?!"))*"""/ Spacing
Line 119: Line 134:
=== Notes for implementation ===
Line 120: Line 136:
== Docstring Revision == ==== DocStrings ====
Line 122: Line 138:
Currently docstrings are regular strings that appear before a Term in an !TypeDef, presumably after the list of supertypes: Multiple docstrings may be present on a single definition, but only the first one encountered on a definition is considered its primary docstring, and implementers are free to store or discard the other doc strings as they see fit. Docstrings on type-addenda should be concatenated with a newline to the previous docstring(s), or appended to a list of docstrings, associated with the type.
Line 124: Line 140:
{{{
type := supertype1 & supertype2 &
  "Docstring"
  [ ... ].
}}}
==== Comments ====
Line 130: Line 142:
But this syntax is not supported in all processors (namely PET), and the others allow variations. At the 2018 summit in Paris (see DiderotSchedule), there was a decision to distinguish docstrings from other strings by using triple-quotes (three double-quotes in a row, similar to Python), which additionally allows quotes to appear inside the docstring.


{{{
type := supertype1 & supertype2 &
  """Docstring"""
  [ ... ].
}}}

This changed the !DocString production like so:

{{{#!highlight ruby
DocString := /"""([^"\\]|\\.|"[^"]|""[^"])*"""/ Spacing
}}}

(note that an unescaped quote cannot appear directly before the ending triple-quotes (or rather, it can, but the string would be terminated early and there'd be an extra quote character in the stream))

There are remaining questions about their placement.

=== Option 1: Placed before any Term with multiple docstrings per type allowed ===

Where multiple docstrings occur, the type's final docstring is the concatenation of them.

Example:

{{{
type := """here""" supertype1 & """here""" supertype2 &
  """here, too"""
  [ ... ] """maybe here?""".
}}}

This can be implemented by changing the following producitons:

{{{#!highlight ruby
TypeDef := Type ( AvmDef | AvmAddendum ) DocString? Dot # maybe
LexRuleDef := LexRuleId DefOp Affix? DefBody DocString? Dot # maybe
AvmAddendum := AddOp ( DefBody | Conjunction | DocString )
DefBody := Supertypes ( And Conjunction )?
Supertypes := DocString? Type ( And DocString? Type )*
Term := Docstring? ( Type
                           | FeatureTerm
                           | DiffList
                           | ConsList
                           | Coreference
                           | DQString
                           | QSymbol
                           | Regex
                           )
}}}

=== Option 2: Placed before any Term with only one docstring per type allowed ===

Example:

{{{
type := supertype1 & """just one, somewhere""" supertype2 &
  [ ... ].
}}}

This is more complicated to describe as production rules (need to duplicate several productions; some for use before docstring is encountered, then others for use after), but the implementation may be simple (just set a flag after reading a docstring).

=== Option 3: Once, after the list of supertypes and before any feature list ===

Example:

{{{
type := supertype1 & supertype2 &
  """just one, here"""
  [ ... ].

type2 := supertype1 &
  """what about this?"""
  [ ... ] & supertype2.
}}}

This is not hard to implement. If it only needs to appear after *a* list of supertypes (both examples above), it's the same as in the full production list above (but other supertypes could appear after a feature list, for instance). If one wants to ensure that all supertypes appear before any docstring or feature list (only the first example above), then we need to duplicate the Conjunction and Term productions to disallow Types at the top level. If that's something desired, it would look like this:

{{{#!highlight
AvmAddendum := AddOp ( DefBody | DocString? NoTypeConj | DocString )
DefBody := Supertypes DocString? ( And NoTypeConj )?
NoTypeConj := NoTypeTerm ( And NoTypeTerm )*
NoTypeTerm := ( FeatureTerm
                | DiffList
                | ConsList
                | Coreference
                | DQString
                | QSymbol
                | Regex
                )
}}}

=== Option 4: Once, immediately after the typedef or addendum operators ===

Example:

{{{
type := """just one, here"""
  supertype1 & supertype2 &
  [ ... ].

type :=
  """
  example
  with
  multiple
  lines
  """
  supertype1 & supertype2 &
  [ ... ].
}}}

This is the simplest to implement, and the !DefBody and !Supertypes productions would be unnecessary (unless we still want supertypes to appear first):

{{{#!highlight ruby
AvmDef := DefOp DocString? Conjunction
AvmAddendum := AddOp ( DocString? Conjunction | DocString )
LexRuleDef := LexRuleId DefOp DocString? Affix? Conjunction Dot
}}}

Previously some did not like it for aesthetic reasons, though (although that is subjective).
The syntax description above allows for comments anywhere that separating whitespace is allowed (not including those within strings, regular expressions, letter sets, etc.). This includes within a dotted attribute path (e.g., `[ SYNSEM #| comment |# . #| comment |# LOCAL ... ]`), although grammar developers may want to use this flexibility sparingly.
Line 253: Line 146:
1. The `^` character is used to signal "expanded-syntax" in the LKB, but is this only used for regular expressions? Are there other expanded syntaxes? Do non-LKB processors support them? 1. The `^` character is used to signal "expanded-syntax" in the LKB, but is this only used for regular expressions? Are there other expanded syntaxes? Do non-LKB processors support them? (see [[http://lists.delph-in.net/archives/developers/2009/thread.html#1082|this thread]] on the 'developers' mailing list)
Line 256: Line 149:

3. When supertypes are required (e.g., on a !TypeDef), must they appear before other Terms in the Conjunction? (see [[#Docstring_Revision]] above)

4. Should the (deprecated or repurposed) subtype operator (`:<`) be included in the syntax description?

5. Is variation allowed with regards to the position of docstrings? (see [[#Docstring_Revision]] above)

6. Are spaces allowed inside a feature path? Comments?
   {{{
   type := supertype &
     [ ATTR1
       . ; comment here?
       ATTR2 value ];
   }}}
   For that matter, are comments allowed anywhere that whitespace is (except maybe letter-sets and lex-rule affix patterns)?
Line 278: Line 156:
 * [[http://lists.delph-in.net/archives/developers/2006/000419.html|Mailing list discussion about docstrings (Feb 2006)]]
 * [[http://lists.delph-in.net/archives/developers/2006/000550.html|Mailing list discussion about type addenda (Jul 2006)]]
 * [[http://lists.delph-in.net/archives/developers/2007/000762.html|Mailing list discussion about docstrings (Mar 2007)]]
 * [[http://lists.delph-in.net/archives/developers/2007/000868.html|Mailing list discussion about docstrings (Sep 2007)]]
 * [[http://lists.delph-in.net/archives/developers/2008/001037.html|Mailing list discussion about the :+ and :< operators (Nov 2008)]]
 * [[http://lists.delph-in.net/archives/developers/2009/001082.html|Mailing list discussion about regular expressions in TDL (Jan 2009)]]
 * [[http://lists.delph-in.net/archives/developers/2018/002754.html|Mailing list discussion about TDL syntax (Jul 2018)]]
 * [[http://lists.delph-in.net/archives/developers/2018/002792.html|Mailing list discussion about docstrings (Aug 2018)]]

Type Description Language and other aspects of DELPH-IN Joint Reference Formalism

Case Sensitivity

Case Sensitive

  • Things inside quotes (NB: strings passed from TFS world into MRS can be treated as case insensitive in MRS processing (i.e. as predicate symbols, but not CARGs)

Case Insensitive

  • Everything in TDL not inside of quotes.
  • Lexicon look-up.
    • Proper names?
    • Acronyms?
  • .. approach these with token-mapping (preserve the info, and then downcase anyway)

Unknown

  • Orthographic subrules (agree: case sensitive, ACE: [intended] case insensitive)

Notes: Arguments for case insensitive include shouting (call caps); Arguments for case sensitive include the use of upper case vowels in vowel harmony languages (linguistic representations, not orthography)

Doc Strings

TDL definitions allow documentation strings ("docstrings") before any term in the top-level conjunction or before the terminating dot (.) character:

n_-_c_le := n_intr_lex_entry
"""Intransitive count noun (icn)    
<ex>The dog barked.
<nex>Much dog bark.""".

TDL File Syntax

   1 # File Contents
   2 
   3 TdlTypeFile  := ( TypeDef | TypeAddendum | Spacing )* EOF
   4 TdlRuleFile  := ( LexRuleDef | MorphSet | Spacing )* EOF
   5 
   6 # Types and Lexical Rules
   7 
   8 TypeDef      := Type DefOp TypedDefBody Dot
   9 Typeddendum  := Type AddOp ( DefBody | DocString ) Dot
  10 LexRuleDef   := LexRuleId DefOp Affix? TypedDefBody Dot
  11 LexRuleId    := Identifier Spacing
  12 
  13 # Definition Bodies (top-level conjunctions of terms)
  14 #
  15 #   The body of a type definition, type addendum, or lexical rule is
  16 #   essentially a conjunction of Terms, but there are two special features
  17 #   of top-level conjunctions (i.e., those outside of an AVM):
  18 #
  19 #     (1) """DocStrings""" may precede any Term or the final Dot (.)
  20 #
  21 #     (2) TypeDef and LexRuleDef require at least one Type (supertype)
  22 #         somewhere in the conjunction (conventionally the first Term)
  23 
  24 TypedDefBody := ( TopLevelConj And )? DocString? Type ( And TopLevelConj )? DocString?
  25 DefBody      := TopLevelConj DocString?
  26 TopLevelConj := DocString? Term ( And DocString? Term )*
  27 DocString    := TQString
  28 
  29 # Terms and Conjunctions
  30 
  31 Conjunction  := Term ( And Term )*
  32 Type         := Identifier Spacing
  33 Term         := ( Type
  34                 | FeatureTerm
  35                 | DiffList
  36                 | ConsList
  37                 | Coreference
  38                 | DQString
  39                 | QSymbol
  40                 | Regex
  41                 )
  42 FeatureTerm  := LBrack AttrVals? RBrack
  43 AttrVals     := AttrVal ( Comma AttrVal )*
  44 AttrVal      := Attribute ( Dot Attribute )* Conjunction
  45 Attribute    := Identifier Spacing
  46 DiffList     := DLOpen Conjunctions? DLClose
  47 ConsList     := CLOpen ( Conjunctions ConsEnd? )? CLClose
  48 ConsEnd      := Comma Ellipsis | Dot Conjunction
  49 Conjunctions := Conjunction ( Comma Conjunction )*
  50 Coreference  := "#" Identifier Spacing
  51 
  52 # Letter-sets, Wild-cards, and Affixes
  53 
  54 MorphSet     := "%" "(" ( LetterSetDef | WildCardDef ) ")"
  55 LetterSetDef := "letter-set" Space? "(" LetterSetVar Space LetterSet ")"
  56 WildCardDef  := "wild-card" Space? "(" WildCardVar Space LetterSet ")"
  57 LetterSetVar := /![^ ]/
  58 WildCardVar  := /\?[^ ]/
  59 LetterSet    := /([^)\\]|\\.)+/
  60 Affix        := AffixClass AffixPattern+ Spacing
  61 AffixClass   := "%prefix" | "%suffix"
  62 AffixPattern := Space? "(" ( NullChar | CharList ) Space CharList ")"
  63 CharList     := ( LetterSetVar | WildCardVar | AffixChar )+
  64 NullChar     := "*"
  65 AffixChar    := /([^!?\s*\\]|\\[^ ])+/
  66 
  67 # Whitespace and Comments
  68 
  69 Spacing      := Space? Comment*
  70 Space        := /\s+/
  71 Comment      := ( LineComment | BlockComment ) Space?
  72 LineComment  := /;.*$/
  73 BlockComment := "#|" /([^|\\]|\\.|\|(?!#))*/ "|#"
  74 
  75 # Literals
  76 
  77 DefOp        := ":=" Spacing
  78 AddOp        := ":+" Spacing
  79 Identifier   := /[^\s.:<=&,#[]$()>!^\/]+/
  80 Dot          := "." Spacing
  81 And          := "&" Spacing
  82 Comma        := "," Spacing
  83 LBrack       := "[" Spacing
  84 RBrack       := "]" Spacing
  85 DLOpen       := "<!" Spacing
  86 DLClose      := "!>" Spacing
  87 CLOpen       := "<" Spacing
  88 CLClose      := ">" Spacing
  89 Ellipsis     := "..." Spacing
  90 DQString     := /"([^"\\]|\\.)*"/ Spacing
  91 TQString     := /"""([^"\\]|\\.|"(?!")|""(?!"))*"""/ Spacing
  92 QSymbol      := "'" Identifier Spacing
  93 Regex        := "^" /([^$\\]|\\.)*/ "$"

Notes for implementation

DocStrings

Multiple docstrings may be present on a single definition, but only the first one encountered on a definition is considered its primary docstring, and implementers are free to store or discard the other doc strings as they see fit. Docstrings on type-addenda should be concatenated with a newline to the previous docstring(s), or appended to a list of docstrings, associated with the type.

Comments

The syntax description above allows for comments anywhere that separating whitespace is allowed (not including those within strings, regular expressions, letter sets, etc.). This includes within a dotted attribute path (e.g., [ SYNSEM #| comment |# . #| comment |# LOCAL ... ]), although grammar developers may want to use this flexibility sparingly.

Questions

1. The ^ character is used to signal "expanded-syntax" in the LKB, but is this only used for regular expressions? Are there other expanded syntaxes? Do non-LKB processors support them? (see this thread on the 'developers' mailing list)

2. Are instances distinguishable from types? Are they (other other entities) restricted to having exactly one supertype?

Discussions

TdlRfc (last edited 2020-06-05 06:38:36 by FrancisBond)

(The DELPH-IN infrastructure is hosted at the University of Oslo)